Trademark Law India Archives

Nike swooshes away trademark infringers, comes out All Stars

The Delhi District Court awarded a permanent injunction to Nike, prohibiting unauthorized use of its trademarks by local defendants in a case of trademark infringement and passing off. The Court’s decision reinforces trademark protection standards, ruling in favor of Nike with exemplary damages for brand misrepresentation. Continue Reading Nike swooshes away trademark infringers, comes out All Stars

November 12, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 450Views 3Likes

ShareFacebook

“VARUN” scoops up an icy win against “ARUN”, court affirms co-existence of Trademarks

In Hatsun Agro Product Limited vs B. Balakrishnan Nair, the High Court of Madras upheld the trademark ‘VARUN,’ dismissing Hatsun’s claim for cancellation based on phonetic similarity with ‘ARUN.’ The court found that both marks could coexist without consumer confusion, considering the regional scope and distinctiveness factors. Continue Reading “VARUN” scoops up an icy win against “ARUN”, court affirms co-existence of Trademarks

November 11, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 287Views 2Likes

ShareFacebook

CIT Trademark: Coimbatore Institute of Technology Prevails over Chennai Institute of Technology

The Madras High Court granted Coimbatore Institute of Technology exclusive rights over the “CIT” trademark, ruling against Chennai Institute of Technology’s concurrent use. The court determined that Chennai Institute’s use of “CIT” was misleading, lacking distinctiveness, and obtained through suppression of facts. The respondent’s mark was ordered to be removed from the trademark register. Continue Reading CIT Trademark: Coimbatore Institute of Technology Prevails over Chennai Institute of Technology

November 7, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 275Views 1Like

ShareFacebook

Subsequent User’s ‘Suguna’ Trademark for Grinders Rectified Despite Proof of Use from 2001

The Madras High Court ruled in favor of petitioners V. Lakshminarayanasamy and Suguna Lakshminarayanasamy in the “SUGUNA” trademark case, ordering the rectification of the respondent’s mark registration due to its deceptive similarity and potential for consumer confusion. The court emphasized the petitioners’ established prior use and rejected the respondent’s defense of concurrent usage. Continue Reading Subsequent User’s ‘Suguna’ Trademark for Grinders Rectified Despite Proof of Use from 2001

October 28, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 278Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Celebrating 20 Years of IP Excellence

Nike swooshes away trademark infringers, comes out All Stars

“VARUN” scoops up an icy win against “ARUN”, court affirms co-existence of Trademarks

CIT Trademark: Coimbatore Institute of Technology Prevails over Chennai Institute of Technology

Subsequent User’s ‘Suguna’ Trademark for Grinders Rectified Despite Proof of Use from 2001

Connect with Us

BananaIP has been acknowledged as a women-owned enterprise, certified by WEConnect International.

Connect with us