Delhi High Court Archives | Page 9 of 17

Deciphering India’s Design Law: A Series on Noteworthy Judgments (Part 2)

In the second installment of our series on Design Patents in India, BananaIP Counsels presents an analysis of critical judgments that define the scope and interpretation of design law in the country. These rulings offer clarity for stakeholders and contribute significantly to the evolving legal framework surrounding designs. The claim for infringement not established: No Design Infringement of Hipster Alcohol Bottle Design Alcobrew's bottles do not prima facie infringe the registered 'Hipster' bottle design of Diageo says Delhi Court. While rejecting…

September 25, 2023 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Industrial Designs, Intellectual Property 0Comment 1149Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Deciphering India’s Design Law: A Series on Noteworthy Judgments (Part 1)

Kickstarting our series on India's design law, we explore three significant verdicts that shed light on the nuances of intellectual property protection. Adoption of strikingly similar Sonic Nozzle Design prima facie amounts to infringement, says Calcutta High Court. The Calcutta High Court recently granted an interim injunction in favour of Raring Corporation with respect to its registered design pertaining to the sonic nozzle used in dust collection and suppression equipment. The Court stated that the defendant's nozzle is strikingly similar to…

September 21, 2023 BananaIP Reporter Industrial Designs, Intellectual Property 0Comment 1523Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Delhi High Court Grants Relief to Louis Vuitton Against Counterfeiters: A Comprehensive Analysis

In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court granted relief to luxury brand Louis Vuitton Malletier by issuing a permanent injunction and awarding damages against three defendants involved in the manufacturing and selling of counterfeit goods bearing the Louis Vuitton trademarks. Continue Reading Delhi High Court Grants Relief to Louis Vuitton Against Counterfeiters: A Comprehensive Analysis

April 28, 2023 BananaIP Reporter Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 1823Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Delhi High Court Fines Defendant 2 Lakhs for Infringing Use of “Sadda Pind”

The Delhi High Court passed an order granting a permanent injunction and punitive costs of ₹ 2,00,000/- to the defendant for infringing and passing off the Plaintiff’s Trademark “SADDA PIND”. Continue Reading Delhi High Court Fines Defendant 2 Lakhs for Infringing Use of “Sadda Pind”

April 18, 2023 BananaIP Reporter Case Study, Copyrights, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 1084Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Monthly Roundup: Key IP Cases reported in March 2023

BananaIP Counsels has been following the recent developments in Trademarks, Patents, Copyrights, and Designs cases. This monthly roundup provides some insight into the developments made in these cases by various High Courts in India. The month of March saw an interesting mix of intellectual property decisions from courts in India. This post brings to you a list of important decisions relating to Trademarks, Copyrights, Patents, Consumer Protection and Accessibility Laws. We hope that this information helps our readers stay informed…

April 10, 2023 BananaIP Reporter Accessibility, Case Study, Copyrights, e-Commerce Law, Intellectual Property, Patents, Trademarks 0Comment 5743Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Delhi HC Orders Institute of Cost Accountants of India to Remove ICAI Acronym

In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has prohibited the Institute of Cost Accountants of India from using the trademarked acronym “ICAI” for any of its services or institutions. “ICAI” is owned by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. The Single Bench of the court also ordered the Institute of Cost Accountants of India to remove the ICAI acronym within three months from all extant physical and virtual representations, including websites. Continue Reading Delhi HC Orders Institute of…

April 7, 2023 BananaIP Reporter Case Study, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 1250Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Delhi High Court Declares Hermès’ “H” a Well-Known Trademark

Recently in a trademark infringement case between Hermès International & Anr. v. Crimzon Fashion Accessories Private Limited, the Delhi High Court ruled that the “H” mark of the French Luxury brand Hermès International is a well-known mark, after ordering a permanent injunction against Crimzon for infringing use of the mark on its website. Continue Reading Delhi High Court Declares Hermès’ “H” a Well-Known Trademark

March 3, 2023 BananaIP Reporter Case Study, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 1846Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

The Battle over “KHAN CHACHA” Trademark

The Delhi High Court, recently granted an ex parte interim injunction to the plaintiff Gupta And Gupta Pvt Ltd, restraining the defendants from using the mark “KHAN CHACHA”. The court observed that in cases involving trademarks or copyrights, an injunction is usually granted regardless of any delay in taking a legal action. This blog is a summary of the case so far. Continue Reading The Battle over “KHAN CHACHA” Trademark

February 27, 2023 BananaIP Reporter Case Study, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 1765Views 2Likes

ShareFacebook

Case Review: Delhi High Court Upholds Ruling in Global Music Junction Pvt. Ltd vs Annapurna Films Pvt. Ltd., & Ors.

Delhi High Court has ruled in favor of Keshari Lal Yadav and other defendants in a copyright infringement lawsuit brought forward by Global Music Junction Pte Ltd. The Court held that the Plaintiff had exclusive rights to all material created under their agreement prior to its termination, but lacked the ability to protect rights for future works. Continue Reading Case Review: Delhi High Court Upholds Ruling in Global Music Junction Pvt. Ltd vs Annapurna Films Pvt. Ltd., & Ors.

January 30, 2023 BananaIP Reporter Copyrights, Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law 0Comment 3464Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Subway Loses Battle for Interim Injunction against Suberb

This post details a case between U.S.-based company ‘SUBWAY’ and Infinity Foods LLLP over allegations of trademark infringement. The court dismissed the application for an interim injunction due to changes made by the defendants within a week, as they deemed there was no point of infringement. Continue Reading Subway Loses Battle for Interim Injunction against Suberb

January 24, 2023 BananaIP Reporter Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 2338Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Celebrating 20 Years of IP Excellence

Deciphering India’s Design Law: A Series on Noteworthy Judgments (Part 2)

Deciphering India’s Design Law: A Series on Noteworthy Judgments (Part 1)

Delhi High Court Grants Relief to Louis Vuitton Against Counterfeiters: A Comprehensive Analysis

Delhi High Court Fines Defendant 2 Lakhs for Infringing Use of “Sadda Pind”

Monthly Roundup: Key IP Cases reported in March 2023

Delhi HC Orders Institute of Cost Accountants of India to Remove ICAI Acronym

Delhi High Court Declares Hermès’ “H” a Well-Known Trademark

The Battle over “KHAN CHACHA” Trademark

Case Review: Delhi High Court Upholds Ruling in Global Music Junction Pvt. Ltd vs Annapurna Films Pvt. Ltd., & Ors.

Subway Loses Battle for Interim Injunction against Suberb

Connect with Us

BananaIP has been acknowledged as a women-owned enterprise, certified by WEConnect International.

Connect with us