Delhi High Court Archives | Page 8 of 17

Use of the Trademark ‘Candlelight’ for Musical Concerts restrained by the Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court restrains Festival House Immersive from using ‘Candlelight’ for concerts, in a notable trademark case filed by Fever Labs, a global live entertainment platform. Continue Reading Use of the Trademark ‘Candlelight’ for Musical Concerts restrained by the Delhi High Court

February 9, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 1074Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Play Music IN Wedding Sangeet and Cocktail Party only after making a deposit of One Lakh Rupees, says the Delhi High Court.

Copyrighted Music in Wedding functions: Court orders deposit for Sangeet and Cocktail Parties

The Delhi High Court rules a ₹1 Lakh deposit for Sangeet and Cocktail party music, impacting wedding event licensing. This decision addresses copyright laws and sets a precedent for music usage at private functions, highlighting the legalities of playing copyrighted music and the necessity for obtaining proper licenses. Continue Reading Copyrighted Music in Wedding functions: Court orders deposit for Sangeet and Cocktail Parties

February 2, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law 0Comment 1907Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Injunction on use of similar labels, prima facie injunction of Patent Claims and more…

Officer’s Choice Trademark, Zinking Patent and Baoji Footwear Cases

This post highlights recent decisions by the High Court of Delhi and Himachal Pradesh on intellectual property rights, focusing on trademark and patent infringement cases. The cases involve disputes over whisky label similarities, fertilizer patent claims, and the contentious use of a registered trademark. Care Notes Officer's Choice Vs. Peace Maker Prestige Whisky: The Delhi High Court injuncts the use of a similar label. In a case involving the labels of Officer's Choice and Peace Maker for whisky, the Delhi High…

January 22, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Patents, Trademarks 0Comment 768Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Patent Examination and Pre-Grant Opposition are independent processes

Patent Examination and Pre-Grant Opposition are independent processes, says the Delhi High Court In an appeal filed by Novartis from the decision of a Single Judge, the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court considered if a pre-grant opponent would have the right to participate and get a hearing with respect to amendments made by the patent applicant based on directions of the Controller of Patents. The pre-grant oppositions in the case were filed by NATCO and several others, and…

January 10, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Patents 0Comment 1036Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Trademark Value: NYKAA, A to Z, Social, and Burger King Trademark Injunctions

In this post, we bring to you 4 trademark cases where injunctions were granted in favour of trademark owners. The cases relate to popular brands such as Nykaa, Social, A to Z, and Burger King. Nykaa Vs. Oykaa for Cosmetics: Delhi High Court grants exparte injunction restraining Oykaa. In a case involving the trademarks Nykaa and Oykaa for cosmetics, healthcare, personal care, and wellness products, the Delhi High Court granted an exparte injunction restraining the use of Oykaa. The Court stated…

January 10, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 1085Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Indiamart cannot claim Intermediary Status, says Delhi High Court

Indiamart is prima facie infringing Puma’s trademark, and it cannot claim intermediary safe harbour as its actions do not amount to the requisite due diligence required under the intermediary guidelines, says the Delhi High Court. Continue Reading Indiamart cannot claim Intermediary Status, says Delhi High Court

January 5, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, e-Commerce Law, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 1337Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Key High Court IP Decisions: Summaries and Implications

Gain insights into the latest Intellectual Property cases from the Delhi High Court. Understand key legal developments and their impact. Continue Reading Key High Court IP Decisions: Summaries and Implications

December 18, 2023 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property 0Comment 1081Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Featured Image for the Weekly Roundup : Trademark case updates

Latest Trademark Law Decisions in India: Key Rulings and Insights – 2023

Explore the latest 2023 updates in Indian trademark law. This post delves into recent court decisions, analyzing key rulings on trademark distinctiveness, registration, and infringement. Stay informed with insights and implications from pivotal cases shaping India’s trademark legal landscape. Continue Reading Latest Trademark Law Decisions in India: Key Rulings and Insights – 2023

December 11, 2023 BananaIP Reporter Case Study, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 5183Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

In-Depth Review of Recent Trademark Judgments by the Delhi High Court: Key Decisions on 'NATURE'S VARIETY', 'Kavach', and 'Oleev Active'

Indian Courts on Trademark Law: Key Decisions Review – Part 8

Explore the Delhi High Court’s latest judgments in trademark law, analyzing the distinctiveness and registrability of ‘NATURE’S VARIETY’, ‘Kavach’, and ‘Oleev Active’, and their impact on Indian intellectual property rights. Continue Reading Indian Courts on Trademark Law: Key Decisions Review – Part 8

December 1, 2023 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 1052Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Insightful Analysis of Recent Indian Trademark Court Decisions – Part 7

Explore Part 7 of our series on Trademarks in the Courtroom, featuring key decisions from Indian courts. Delve into the Bombay and Delhi High Courts’ rulings on ‘I am,’ ‘Smart Cities India,’ and ‘Just Milk’ trademarks, offering valuable insights into India’s evolving trademark jurisprudence. Continue Reading Insightful Analysis of Recent Indian Trademark Court Decisions – Part 7