Delhi High Court Archives | Page 7 of 17

Refusal of a patent application based on prior art not cited in hearing notice set aside by the Delhi High Court

In this case the Delhi High Court set aside an order of the Controller of Patents refusing a patent application based on a ground not raised in the hearing notice. The refusal order was set aside as it lacked proper reasoning as required for inventive step analysis. Continue Reading Refusal of a patent application based on prior art not cited in hearing notice set aside by the Delhi High Court

February 14, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Patents 0Comment 942Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Inventive Step analysis requires a rigorous examination, not surface analysis, says the Delhi High Court.

In this case the Delhi High Court set aside an order of the Controller of Patents refusing a patent application. The refusal order was set aside as it lacked proper reasoning as required for inventive step analysis. Continue Reading Inventive Step analysis requires a rigorous examination, not surface analysis, says the Delhi High Court.

February 14, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Patents 0Comment 843Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Image accompanying blogpost on "Method of producing 'protein enriched blood serum' is not a method of treatment under Section 3(i), says the Delhi High Court"

Method of producing ‘protein enriched blood serum’ is not a method of treatment under Section 3(i), says the Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court reviewed whether new objections can be raised at the hearing stage of a Patent Application. The Court examined the claims and the refusal order, from the purview of Principles of Natural Justice. Continue Reading Method of producing ‘protein enriched blood serum’ is not a method of treatment under Section 3(i), says the Delhi High Court

February 13, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Patents 0Comment 802Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Where can you file Trademark Rectification Petitions? The Delhi High Court refers the question to a Larger Bench

Delhi High Court refers the question of filing jurisdiction for trademark rectification petitions to a larger bench, seeking clarity on whether it’s limited to the trademark office’s jurisdiction or any High Court. Continue Reading Where can you file Trademark Rectification Petitions? The Delhi High Court refers the question to a Larger Bench

February 12, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 893Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Use of the Trademark ‘Candlelight’ for Musical Concerts restrained by the Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court restrains Festival House Immersive from using ‘Candlelight’ for concerts, in a notable trademark case filed by Fever Labs, a global live entertainment platform. Continue Reading Use of the Trademark ‘Candlelight’ for Musical Concerts restrained by the Delhi High Court

February 9, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 959Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Play Music IN Wedding Sangeet and Cocktail Party only after making a deposit of One Lakh Rupees, says the Delhi High Court.

Copyrighted Music in Wedding functions: Court orders deposit for Sangeet and Cocktail Parties

The Delhi High Court rules a ₹1 Lakh deposit for Sangeet and Cocktail party music, impacting wedding event licensing. This decision addresses copyright laws and sets a precedent for music usage at private functions, highlighting the legalities of playing copyrighted music and the necessity for obtaining proper licenses. Continue Reading Copyrighted Music in Wedding functions: Court orders deposit for Sangeet and Cocktail Parties

February 2, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law 0Comment 1826Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Injunction on use of similar labels, prima facie injunction of Patent Claims and more…

Officer’s Choice Trademark, Zinking Patent and Baoji Footwear Cases

This post highlights recent decisions by the High Court of Delhi and Himachal Pradesh on intellectual property rights, focusing on trademark and patent infringement cases. The cases involve disputes over whisky label similarities, fertilizer patent claims, and the contentious use of a registered trademark. Care Notes Officer's Choice Vs. Peace Maker Prestige Whisky: The Delhi High Court injuncts the use of a similar label. In a case involving the labels of Officer's Choice and Peace Maker for whisky, the Delhi High…

January 22, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Patents, Trademarks 0Comment 724Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Patent Examination and Pre-Grant Opposition are independent processes

Patent Examination and Pre-Grant Opposition are independent processes, says the Delhi High Court In an appeal filed by Novartis from the decision of a Single Judge, the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court considered if a pre-grant opponent would have the right to participate and get a hearing with respect to amendments made by the patent applicant based on directions of the Controller of Patents. The pre-grant oppositions in the case were filed by NATCO and several others, and…

January 10, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Patents 0Comment 985Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Trademark Value: NYKAA, A to Z, Social, and Burger King Trademark Injunctions

In this post, we bring to you 4 trademark cases where injunctions were granted in favour of trademark owners. The cases relate to popular brands such as Nykaa, Social, A to Z, and Burger King. Nykaa Vs. Oykaa for Cosmetics: Delhi High Court grants exparte injunction restraining Oykaa. In a case involving the trademarks Nykaa and Oykaa for cosmetics, healthcare, personal care, and wellness products, the Delhi High Court granted an exparte injunction restraining the use of Oykaa. The Court stated…

January 10, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 1015Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Indiamart cannot claim Intermediary Status, says Delhi High Court

Indiamart is prima facie infringing Puma’s trademark, and it cannot claim intermediary safe harbour as its actions do not amount to the requisite due diligence required under the intermediary guidelines, says the Delhi High Court. Continue Reading Indiamart cannot claim Intermediary Status, says Delhi High Court

January 5, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, e-Commerce Law, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 1246Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Celebrating 20 Years of IP Excellence

Refusal of a patent application based on prior art not cited in hearing notice set aside by the Delhi High Court

Inventive Step analysis requires a rigorous examination, not surface analysis, says the Delhi High Court.

Method of producing ‘protein enriched blood serum’ is not a method of treatment under Section 3(i), says the Delhi High Court

Where can you file Trademark Rectification Petitions? The Delhi High Court refers the question to a Larger Bench

Use of the Trademark ‘Candlelight’ for Musical Concerts restrained by the Delhi High Court

Copyrighted Music in Wedding functions: Court orders deposit for Sangeet and Cocktail Parties

Officer’s Choice Trademark, Zinking Patent and Baoji Footwear Cases

Patent Examination and Pre-Grant Opposition are independent processes

Trademark Value: NYKAA, A to Z, Social, and Burger King Trademark Injunctions

Indiamart cannot claim Intermediary Status, says Delhi High Court

Connect with Us

BananaIP has been acknowledged as a women-owned enterprise, certified by WEConnect International.

Connect with us