Delhi High Court Archives | Page 2 of 18

Cannot drive on ‘VOLVO’ and ‘FMX’ marks’ reputation rules court

The Delhi High Court passed a permanent injunction and summary judgment in favor of AB Volvo and its group companies in a trademark infringement suit against Lamina Suspension Products Ltd. The court restrained the Defendant from using the “VOLVO” and “FMX” trademarks on leaf spring products, enforcing the settlement terms and protecting Volvo’s well-known trademarks in India. Continue Reading Cannot drive on ‘VOLVO’ and ‘FMX’ marks’ reputation rules court

December 21, 2024 IP AI Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 499Views 1Like

ShareFacebook

Revisiting Novartis versus Natco – Cancer drugs, divisional applications and patent validity

The Delhi High Court upheld Novartis’s patent on Ceritinib, rejecting Natco Pharma’s claims of invalidity and allegations of material suppression. The court ruled that the divisional application’s refusal was immaterial to the case and reaffirmed the patent’s validity based on inventive step, novelty, and therapeutic benefits. Natco’s application to vacate the injunction was dismissed. Continue Reading Revisiting Novartis versus Natco – Cancer drugs, divisional applications and patent validity

December 17, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Patents 0Comment 860Views 2Likes

ShareFacebook

ITC obtains injunction against former owners of NIMYLE and JOR-POWR Trademarks

The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction to ITC Limited, restraining Arpita Agro from using the deceptively similar trademark “POWRNYM.” The case highlights issues of trademark infringement, passing off, and contractual obligations, emphasizing the importance of protecting intellectual property rights. Continue Reading ITC obtains injunction against former owners of NIMYLE and JOR-POWR Trademarks

December 4, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 571Views 2Likes

ShareFacebook

COCOMELON spells a ‘Melon’cholic end for Copycat Competitors

The Delhi High Court ordered the cancellation of a deceptively similar COCOMELON trademark registered by the respondent. Treasure Studio Inc., the creators of the globally recognized children’s brand, successfully secured relief, ensuring stronger protection for its distinctive trademark and intellectual property rights. Continue Reading COCOMELON spells a ‘Melon’cholic end for Copycat Competitors

December 2, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 610Views 1Like

ShareFacebook

“TATA COPPER+ WATER” Trademark Infringement Injuncted with Nominal Damages

The Delhi High Court issued a permanent injunction in favor of Tata Sons, preventing the use of trademarks and trade dress similar to “TATA COPPER+ WATER.” The defendant ceased infringement and nominal damages of ₹1,00,000 were awarded, acknowledging the defendant’s cooperation and first-time offense. Continue Reading “TATA COPPER+ WATER” Trademark Infringement Injuncted with Nominal Damages

November 15, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 486Views 2Likes

ShareFacebook

Rummy Culture and Gameskraft Trademarks: Order to Take Down Infringing Online Gaming Websites and Apps

The Delhi High Court granted Gameskraft Technologies an interim injunction against websites infringing on its trademarks, including RummyCulture, ordering a takedown and domain block. The order protects Gameskraft’s IP, restraining defendants from further infringement or using SEO keywords linked to Gameskraft’s trademarks. Continue Reading Rummy Culture and Gameskraft Trademarks: Order to Take Down Infringing Online Gaming Websites and Apps

November 14, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 898Views 2Likes

ShareFacebook

Court restores patent application despite missed deadline to file request for examination

The Delhi High Court restored Bry-Air’s patent application after finding the delay was due to the former patent agent’s negligence, not the petitioner’s actions. The court emphasized that applicants should not suffer due to agents’ faults and allowed Bry-Air to proceed with Form 18 submission for patent examination. Continue Reading Court restores patent application despite missed deadline to file request for examination

November 6, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Patents 0Comment 613Views 1Like

ShareFacebook

Telugu Actor Manchu Vishnu gets a John Doe Order to prevent misuse of his Name, voice and Likeness

The Delhi High Court granted Telugu actor Manchu Vishnu an interim injunction, barring content creators from unauthorized use of his name, image, and voice. The Court ordered the removal of defamatory content and directed YouTube to identify infringing accounts. Continue Reading Telugu Actor Manchu Vishnu gets a John Doe Order to prevent misuse of his Name, voice and Likeness

November 5, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Publicity Rights/ Celebrity Rights 0Comment 764Views 2Likes

ShareFacebook

Delhi High Court Orders Restoration of Patent Lapsed Due to Communication Error of the Patent Office

The Delhi High Court ruled in favor of Thijs, Roeland Michel Mathieu, ordering the restoration of Patent No. 408932 after it lapsed due to a communication error by the Patent Office. The court determined the lapse was not intentional on the appellant’s part and required the respondent to restore the patent upon payment of the renewal fee. Continue Reading Delhi High Court Orders Restoration of Patent Lapsed Due to Communication Error of the Patent Office

October 31, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Patents 0Comment 589Views 1Like

ShareFacebook

Trademarks and Family Disputes: Without an Agreement in Writing, Trademarks Cannot be Deemed to be Assigned

The Delhi High Court ruled in favor of Chasvinder Singh, affirming his exclusive rights over the SAP SWISS trademark in an appeal concerning its use by family members in the automotive industry. The court set aside a prior interim injunction and clarified the importance of written agreements in trademark assignments, concluding that no binding family settlement included the transfer of trademark rights. Continue Reading Trademarks and Family Disputes: Without an Agreement in Writing, Trademarks Cannot be Deemed to be Assigned

October 29, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 581Views 1Like

ShareFacebook

Celebrating 20 Years of IP Excellence

Cannot drive on ‘VOLVO’ and ‘FMX’ marks’ reputation rules court

Revisiting Novartis versus Natco – Cancer drugs, divisional applications and patent validity

ITC obtains injunction against former owners of NIMYLE and JOR-POWR Trademarks

COCOMELON spells a ‘Melon’cholic end for Copycat Competitors

“TATA COPPER+ WATER” Trademark Infringement Injuncted with Nominal Damages

Rummy Culture and Gameskraft Trademarks: Order to Take Down Infringing Online Gaming Websites and Apps

Court restores patent application despite missed deadline to file request for examination

Telugu Actor Manchu Vishnu gets a John Doe Order to prevent misuse of his Name, voice and Likeness

Delhi High Court Orders Restoration of Patent Lapsed Due to Communication Error of the Patent Office

Trademarks and Family Disputes: Without an Agreement in Writing, Trademarks Cannot be Deemed to be Assigned

Connect with Us

BananaIP has been acknowledged as a women-owned enterprise, certified by WEConnect International.

Connect with us