Patents Archives

2024 IP Report Indicates Increase in Patent and Design Filings with India Among Key Contributors

The 2024 World Intellectual Property Indicators report reveals a significant rise in global patent and design filings, led by contributions from key Asian economies, including India. India’s 15.7% increase in patent filings reflects a surge in domestic IP activity and aligns with global trends in computer technology and digital communication. Continue Reading 2024 IP Report Indicates Increase in Patent and Design Filings with India Among Key Contributors

November 15, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Industrial Designs, Intellectual Property, Patents, Trademarks 0Comment 161Views 1Like

ShareFacebook

Court restores patent application despite missed deadline to file request for examination

The Delhi High Court restored Bry-Air’s patent application after finding the delay was due to the former patent agent’s negligence, not the petitioner’s actions. The court emphasized that applicants should not suffer due to agents’ faults and allowed Bry-Air to proceed with Form 18 submission for patent examination. Continue Reading Court restores patent application despite missed deadline to file request for examination

November 6, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Patents 0Comment 219Views 1Like

ShareFacebook

Delhi High Court Orders Restoration of Patent Lapsed Due to Communication Error of the Patent Office

The Delhi High Court ruled in favor of Thijs, Roeland Michel Mathieu, ordering the restoration of Patent No. 408932 after it lapsed due to a communication error by the Patent Office. The court determined the lapse was not intentional on the appellant’s part and required the respondent to restore the patent upon payment of the renewal fee. Continue Reading Delhi High Court Orders Restoration of Patent Lapsed Due to Communication Error of the Patent Office

October 31, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Patents 0Comment 179Views 1Like

ShareFacebook

Methods for Antibody Production in Genetically Modified Animals are Patentable; they are not covered under Section 3(i) Exclusion

The Madras High Court has overturned the rejection of Kymab Limited’s patent application related to generating antibodies in non-human mammals. The Court found that the invention does not fall under Section 3(i) of the Patents Act, 1970, as it is not a method for treating animals but a process for producing antibodies using genetically modified animals. The patent is now set to be granted. Continue Reading Methods for Antibody Production in Genetically Modified Animals are Patentable; they are not covered…

October 8, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Patents 0Comment 192Views 1Like

ShareFacebook

Claim Amendments within the Scope of Patent Specification are Permissible, the Delhi High Court reiterates

The Delhi High Court overturned the Deputy Controller’s decision rejecting Axcess Limited’s patent application. The Court ruled that the amended claims were within the scope of the original application and remanded the case for fresh consideration, providing guidance on permissible amendments under the Patents Act, 1970. Continue Reading Claim Amendments within the Scope of Patent Specification are Permissible, the Delhi High Court reiterates

October 7, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Patents 0Comment 194Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Blackberry blacks out in case relating to patentability of algorithmic processes

This article analyzes India’s legal stance on the patentability of algorithmic processes under Section 3(k) of the Patents Act, 1970. Focusing on the Delhi High Court’s judgment in Blackberry Limited vs. Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs, the post explores key arguments, legal precedents, and implications for software patents in India. Continue Reading Blackberry blacks out in case relating to patentability of algorithmic processes

September 23, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Patents 0Comment 436Views 3Likes

ShareFacebook

Section 3(j), Essentially biological processes and human intervention

The Madras High Court remanded Sakata Seed Corporation’s patent application, focusing on the human intervention in biological processes under Section 3(j). The Court found that the Applicant’s arguments regarding human intervention were not sufficiently addressed by the Patent Office, leading to a fresh review of the case. Continue Reading Section 3(j), Essentially biological processes and human intervention

September 17, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Patents 0Comment 378Views 4Likes

ShareFacebook

“Be mindful when exercising quasi judicial power, cryptic orders unacceptable” says Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court orders a fresh review of Seiwa Kasei’s ‘PHYTOCUTICLE’ trademark application, challenging the Registrar’s refusal for lack of distinctiveness. Continue Reading “Be mindful when exercising quasi judicial power, cryptic orders unacceptable” says Bombay High Court

September 11, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Patents 0Comment 315Views 3Likes

ShareFacebook

Unreasoned Post Grant Opposition Decision Set Aside by the Calcutta High Court

In the case of Terex India vs. CDE Asia, the Calcutta High Court remanded the patent dispute for fresh consideration, citing procedural flaws and inadequate reasoning in the original decision. The Court emphasized the need for impartiality and ordered that the case be reviewed by a different officer to ensure a fair outcome. Continue Reading Unreasoned Post Grant Opposition Decision Set Aside by the Calcutta High Court

September 4, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Patents 0Comment 332Views 2Likes

ShareFacebook

Computer Programs with Technical Effect such as enhancing speed and efficiency are patentable, reiterates the Delhi High Court

In an appeal decision, the Delhi High Court recently overturned the rejection of two patent applications filed by Ab Initio Technology LLC, concerning data processing methods. These applications, Nos. 6500/DELNP/2011 and 6501/DELNP/2011, were refused by the Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs on the grounds of non-patentability under Section 3(k) of the Patents Act, 1970, as they were deemed to be computer programs per se, and for failing to meet the criteria for divisional applications under Section 16(1). Ab Initio Technology…

August 29, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Patents 0Comment 393Views 1Like

ShareFacebook

Celebrating 20 Years of IP Excellence

2024 IP Report Indicates Increase in Patent and Design Filings with India Among Key Contributors

Court restores patent application despite missed deadline to file request for examination

Delhi High Court Orders Restoration of Patent Lapsed Due to Communication Error of the Patent Office

Methods for Antibody Production in Genetically Modified Animals are Patentable; they are not covered under Section 3(i) Exclusion

Claim Amendments within the Scope of Patent Specification are Permissible, the Delhi High Court reiterates

Blackberry blacks out in case relating to patentability of algorithmic processes

Section 3(j), Essentially biological processes and human intervention

“Be mindful when exercising quasi judicial power, cryptic orders unacceptable” says Bombay High Court

Unreasoned Post Grant Opposition Decision Set Aside by the Calcutta High Court

Computer Programs with Technical Effect such as enhancing speed and efficiency are patentable, reiterates the Delhi High Court

Connect with Us

BananaIP has been acknowledged as a women-owned enterprise, certified by WEConnect International.

Connect with us