Intellectual Property Archives | Page 7 of 269

‘Prime’ Trademark Registration for Salt Cancelled based on Prior, Continuous Use

In the case of Koteshwar Chemfood Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. Sachdeva and Sons Industries Pvt. Ltd., the Delhi High Court ordered rectification of the ‘PRIME’ trademark, removing salt and spices due to non-use, following a petition filed by Koteshwar Chemfood. Continue Reading ‘Prime’ Trademark Registration for Salt Cancelled based on Prior, Continuous Use

September 27, 2024 IP AI Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 390Views 1Like

ShareFacebook

When Saregama found a copyright infringement suit, not so e’Zee’

The Delhi High Court held that Saregama’s suit against Zee Entertainment over copyright infringement was rendered infructuous under Section 60 of the Copyright Act, allowing Saregama to file a counterclaim. The court made no ruling on the final copyright claims, pending trial. Continue Reading When Saregama found a copyright infringement suit, not so e’Zee’

September 26, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Copyrights, Intellectual Property 0Comment 509Views 1Like

ShareFacebook

Flipkart’s Latching On Feature and Trademark Passing Off

The Delhi High Court ruled in favor of Modern Mold Plast, directing Flipkart to block unauthorized sellers from using the ‘MAHARAJA’ trademarks on its platform. The court confirmed that unauthorized sellers latching onto existing listings amounted to passing off and infringing upon the plaintiffs’ trademark rights. Continue Reading Flipkart’s Latching On Feature and Trademark Passing Off

September 25, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 502Views 1Like

ShareFacebook

“Liv-52 versus Liv-40.” In the game of Trademarks you “Liv” or you die!

The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction in favor of Himalaya Global Holdings, restraining the defendants from infringing on the “Liv.52” trademark and using deceptively similar packaging. The court also appointed local commissioners to seize infringing products and gather evidence at the defendants’ premises. Continue Reading “Liv-52 versus Liv-40.” In the game of Trademarks you “Liv” or you die!

September 24, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 410Views 3Likes

ShareFacebook

Blackberry blacks out in case relating to patentability of algorithmic processes

This article analyzes India’s legal stance on the patentability of algorithmic processes under Section 3(k) of the Patents Act, 1970. Focusing on the Delhi High Court’s judgment in Blackberry Limited vs. Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs, the post explores key arguments, legal precedents, and implications for software patents in India. Continue Reading Blackberry blacks out in case relating to patentability of algorithmic processes

September 23, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Patents 0Comment 573Views 3Likes

ShareFacebook

Karnataka High Court breaks barriers on accessibility at Intellectual Property office in landmark ruling

In a landmark judgment, the Karnataka High Court has directed the Indian Intellectual Property Office to implement accessibility measures, ensuring that Persons with Disabilities can interact with the IPO systems seamlessly, setting a new precedent for inclusivity in governmental digital interfaces. Continue Reading Karnataka High Court breaks barriers on accessibility at Intellectual Property office in landmark ruling

September 21, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Accessibility, Case Reviews, General, Intellectual Property 0Comment 643Views 3Likes

ShareFacebook

Court Bans infringers from infringing “RAY-BAN”

Luxottica Group S.P.A., a global leader in eyewear and owner of the Ray-Ban trademark, secured a permanent injunction against Iswar Opticals and others for manufacturing counterfeit products. The Delhi Court ruled in favor of Luxottica based on unchallenged evidence, confirming trademark infringement and violation of copyright. Continue Reading Court Bans infringers from infringing “RAY-BAN”

September 20, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 516Views 2Likes

ShareFacebook

Fake Headsets? Not on Samsung’s Watch: Court Issues Permanent Injunction

The Delhi District Court issued a permanent injunction in favor of Samsung, preventing further sale of counterfeit headsets by several defendants. The Court confirmed trademark infringement and ordered the destruction of fake goods. Samsung was awarded litigation costs but punitive damages were denied. Continue Reading Fake Headsets? Not on Samsung’s Watch: Court Issues Permanent Injunction

September 19, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 355Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Court Directs Meta to Take Down Deepfake Videos of NSE CEO in Urgent Ruling

The Bombay High Court granted urgent interim relief to NSE, ordering Meta and other intermediaries to remove deepfake videos falsely showing NSE’s CEO endorsing stock-picking services. The court highlighted the importance of preventing market manipulation and safeguarding investor trust. Continue Reading Court Directs Meta to Take Down Deepfake Videos of NSE CEO in Urgent Ruling

September 18, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Social Media Law, Trademarks 0Comment 441Views 3Likes

ShareFacebook

Section 3(j), Essentially biological processes and human intervention

The Madras High Court remanded Sakata Seed Corporation’s patent application, focusing on the human intervention in biological processes under Section 3(j). The Court found that the Applicant’s arguments regarding human intervention were not sufficiently addressed by the Patent Office, leading to a fresh review of the case. Continue Reading Section 3(j), Essentially biological processes and human intervention