The Bombay High Court in Atyati vs. Cognizant emphasized the critical need for full and transparent disclosure in ex-parte injunctions, ruling against Atyati for suppressing material facts. This case highlights the importance of integrity in the judicial process, especially in intellectual property disputes. Continue Reading Full and Transparent Disclosure of Material Facts for Ex-parte Injunctions
In a recent ruling, the Calcutta High Court dismissed WBCIL’s appeal seeking an interim injunction against GTZ, providing clarity on product-by-process claims under the Indian Patents Act, 1970. The judgment highlights the crucial role of expert testimony in establishing patent infringement. Continue Reading Clarifying Product-by-Process Patent Claims in India – West Bengal Chemicals v. GTZ
In a landmark decision, the Bombay High Court granted Novartis AG an ad-interim injunction against Novarish Healthcare Private Limited for trademark infringement. Novartis successfully argued that Novarish’s use of the “NOVARISH” mark was deceptively similar to its well-known “NOVARTIS” trademark, leading to the court’s decision to protect Novartis’s intellectual property rights. Continue Reading Novartis says No to Novarish
The Srinagar Bench of the Jammu and Kashmir High Court dismissed an appeal by Emerge Classes in a trademark passing off case. The court emphasized that minor differences in trademarks do not necessarily make them distinct, upholding the injunction in favor of KIE and its associated entities. Continue Reading Did Emerge Classes’ mark fail the ‘passing off’ test?
30th issue of the Indian Patent Journal (26th July 2024) features 3,365 patent publications, 754 grants, and 491 registered designs. Continue Reading Indian Patent and Design Statistics 2024 (July 19th to July 26th)
Glaxo Group Limited secured a legal victory in a trade dress dispute against Qpharm Health Care Limited. The Delhi High Court restrained Qpharm from using deceptively similar packaging and ordered the removal of infringing listings from third-party websites, protecting Glaxo’s established trademarks. Continue Reading Similarity Overdose : Glaxo’s trade dress vs Qpharm’s trade dress
The Office of CGPDTM has scheduled a virtual stakeholders meeting on July 29, 2024, to discuss the Patents Amendment Rules and the requirements for filing Form-27. This open forum aims to address stakeholders’ concerns and facilitate a comprehensive discussion on the working statement of patented inventions in India. Continue Reading CGPDTM Calls Stakeholders Meeting on Patents Amendment Rules, 2024
Girnar Food & Beverages Pvt. Ltd. wins a significant legal battle as the Calcutta High Court cancels The North-Western Cachar Tea Co. Ltd.’s trademark registration. The Court cited brand confusion and insufficient evidence of use by North-Western.
Continue Reading Tusk of War : Girnar’s Jumbo Overpowers North-Western’s Haathi
The Madras High Court ruled in favor of Sebille Educations, asserting that phonetic similarity takes precedence over visual differences in the trademark dispute between “Little Einsteins” and “Little Einsteinz,” emphasizing the importance of protecting established brands from deceptively similar marks. Continue Reading Madras HC on Phonetic Similarity: Little Einsteins vs. Little Einsteinz
29th issue of the Indian Patent Journal (19th July 2024) features 1,274 patent publications, 460 grants, and 554 registered designs. Continue Reading Indian Patent and Design Statistics 2024 (July 12th to July 19th)