Intellectual Property Archives

ITC’s injunction against Arpita Agro upheld

The Delhi High Court upheld ITC’s injunction against Arpita Agro, restraining the company from using the trademark ‘POWRNYM.’ The Court ruled that the mark was deceptively similar to ITC’s ‘NIMYLE’ and ‘JOR-POWR,’ violating trademark rights. The judgment emphasized that contractual obligations and trade dress similarities must be strictly adhered to in trademark disputes. Continue Reading ITC’s injunction against Arpita Agro upheld

March 11, 2025 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 181Views 3Likes

ShareFacebook

Patentability vs. Procedure: Finding the Right Balance during patent examinations

The Delhi High Court ruled in favor of Arcturus Therapeutics, overturning the Controller’s rejection of its patent application on procedural grounds. The Court emphasized that procedural compliance should not override substantive examination, directing the Patent Office to reassess the application on its merits. Continue Reading Patentability vs. Procedure: Finding the Right Balance during patent examinations

March 11, 2025 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Patents 0Comment 189Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Madras High Court Dismisses Patent Infringement Suit, Allows Coexistence of Technologies

The Madras High Court ruled on a patent infringement dispute involving Arumugam Rajendra Babu and Ashok Leyland over battery-swapping technology. The Court found no infringement and dismissed both the suit and counterclaims, allowing both parties to coexist. The ruling addressed prior art, novelty, and the scope of patent protection in the electric vehicle sector. Continue Reading Madras High Court Dismisses Patent Infringement Suit, Allows Coexistence of Technologies

March 10, 2025 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Patents 0Comment 232Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

The Battle for Respect continues: Sammaan Capital v. Svamaan Financial

The Delhi High Court addressed the appeals in the Sammaan Capital v. Svamaan Financial trademark dispute. The case involved phonetic similarity, consumer confusion, and corporate branding rights. The Court maintained the status quo, requiring disclaimers in advertisements and setting a final hearing for April 2025. Continue Reading The Battle for Respect continues: Sammaan Capital v. Svamaan Financial

March 10, 2025 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 231Views 1Like

ShareFacebook

Headquartes of Indian Patent office relocated to Delhi

CGPDTM Headquarters Relocated to New Delhi: Official Notification

The Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT) has announced the relocation of the CGPDTM headquarters to New Delhi, as per the Gazette of India notification dated February 25, 2025. The new office is now operational at Boudhik Sampada Bhawan, Dwarka, New Delhi. This move aims to enhance coordination with central regulatory bodies and improve India’s intellectual property administration. Continue Reading CGPDTM Headquarters Relocated to New Delhi: Official Notification

February 27, 2025 BananaIP Reporter General, Intellectual Property 0Comment 279Views 1Like

ShareFacebook

Amazon Ordered to Pay ₹336 Crore in Damages for Willful Trademark Infringement

The Delhi High Court has ordered Amazon Technologies, Inc. to pay ₹336 crore in damages for willful trademark infringement of the Beverly Hills Polo Club logo. The ruling also includes ₹3.23 crore in litigation costs and a permanent injunction against Amazon. The case, filed by Lifestyle Equities C.V. and Lifestyle Licensing B.V., highlights Amazon’s liability in unauthorized brand usage. Continue Reading Amazon Ordered to Pay ₹336 Crore in Damages for Willful Trademark Infringement

February 27, 2025 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, e-Commerce Law, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 495Views 1Like

ShareFacebook

Thomson Reuters vs ROSS Intelligence : Does training AI models amount to fair use?

The US District Court for Delaware ruled in favor of Thomson Reuters, finding that ROSS Intelligence infringed Westlaw’s copyrights by using its headnotes and editorial content for AI training. The Court rejected ROSS’s fair use defense, emphasizing market harm and the need for AI developers to license copyrighted materials. While granting partial summary judgment to Thomson Reuters, the Court left certain copyright expiration claims for jury determination. This decision reinforces copyright protections in legal research and sets a precedent for…

February 24, 2025 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Copyrights, Intellectual Property 0Comment 464Views 4Likes

ShareFacebook

Frivolous inventions and abstract theories – Delhi High Court refuses patent appeal

The Delhi High Court dismissed an appeal against the rejection of a patent application due to lack of novelty and a significant procedural delay of 701 days. The appellants, who had filed a patent application for black-colored wearables with claimed effects on human energy, failed to provide scientific evidence or technical merit. The court upheld the Indian Patent Office’s decision, emphasizing that abstract ideas are not patentable and reaffirming the importance of adhering to statutory deadlines for appeals. Continue Reading…

February 22, 2025 BananaIP Reporter Case Study, Intellectual Property, Patents 0Comment 478Views 1Like

ShareFacebook

“DREAM FREEDOM” Trademark removed from register for Deceptive Similarity

The Delhi High Court ruled in favor of Gemini Edibles and Fats India Ltd. in a trademark rectification petition, directing the removal of the “DREAM FREEDOM” mark from the Register of Trade Marks. The court found that the respondent had deceptively adopted the mark and trade dress of Gemini’s “FREEDOM” brand, leading to potential consumer confusion. The ruling reinforced the principles of prior use and deceptive similarity in trademark law. Continue Reading “DREAM FREEDOM” Trademark removed from register for Deceptive…

February 20, 2025 IP AI Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 776Views 1Like

ShareFacebook

Patent Abandonment Overturned: Delhi HC Rules on FER Miscommunication

The Delhi High Court set aside the deemed abandonment of Waterotor’s Indian patent application, citing miscommunication regarding the First Examination Report (FER). The Court ruled that the lack of timely FER receipt justified reinstatement, directing the Patent Office to restore the application’s status to “pending” and allow a response within four weeks. Continue Reading Patent Abandonment Overturned: Delhi HC Rules on FER Miscommunication

February 19, 2025 BananaIP Reporter Case Study, Intellectual Property, Patents 0Comment 469Views 2Likes

ShareFacebook

Celebrating 20 Years of IP Excellence

ITC’s injunction against Arpita Agro upheld

Patentability vs. Procedure: Finding the Right Balance during patent examinations

Madras High Court Dismisses Patent Infringement Suit, Allows Coexistence of Technologies

The Battle for Respect continues: Sammaan Capital v. Svamaan Financial

CGPDTM Headquarters Relocated to New Delhi: Official Notification

Amazon Ordered to Pay ₹336 Crore in Damages for Willful Trademark Infringement

Thomson Reuters vs ROSS Intelligence : Does training AI models amount to fair use?

Frivolous inventions and abstract theories – Delhi High Court refuses patent appeal

“DREAM FREEDOM” Trademark removed from register for Deceptive Similarity

Patent Abandonment Overturned: Delhi HC Rules on FER Miscommunication

Connect with Us

BananaIP has been acknowledged as a women-owned enterprise, certified by WEConnect International.

Connect with us

Disclaimer