Trademark Infringement Archives | Page 4 of 12

Court Directs Meta to Take Down Deepfake Videos of NSE CEO in Urgent Ruling

The Bombay High Court granted urgent interim relief to NSE, ordering Meta and other intermediaries to remove deepfake videos falsely showing NSE’s CEO endorsing stock-picking services. The court highlighted the importance of preventing market manipulation and safeguarding investor trust. Continue Reading Court Directs Meta to Take Down Deepfake Videos of NSE CEO in Urgent Ruling

September 18, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Social Media Law, Trademarks 0Comment 448Views 3Likes

ShareFacebook

Century Ply’s claims of Trademark infringement do not fly, rules court

The Delhi Tis Hazari Court dismissed a trademark infringement suit filed by Century Plyboards against Shree Balaji Ply Center. The court found the plaintiff’s allegations based on hearsay evidence and lack of credible proof, resulting in a ruling in favor of the defendant, awarding them the costs of defending the suit. Continue Reading Century Ply’s claims of Trademark infringement do not fly, rules court

September 16, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 470Views 4Likes

ShareFacebook

Delhi High Court issues injunctions for fraudulently using IP Law Firm’s Trademark and Partner’s Name

The Delhi High Court issued an interim injunction in favor of Anand And Anand, safeguarding its trademark against fraudulent impersonation in emails. The court also ordered the blacklisting of email addresses used by cybercriminals and instructed service providers to disclose their identities. Continue Reading Delhi High Court issues injunctions for fraudulently using IP Law Firm’s Trademark and Partner’s Name

September 13, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Copyrights, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 504Views 2Likes

ShareFacebook

Videos, Merchandise, and Image Infringement of the TV Show ‘Taarak Mehta Ka Ooltah Chashmah’ Injuncted

The Delhi High Court issued an ex-parte injunction in favor of Neela Film Productions, creators of “Taarak Mehta Ka Ooltah Chashmah,” restraining various online platforms from infringing the show’s intellectual property rights. This ruling underscores the need for protecting IP against unauthorized use and commercial exploitation. Continue Reading Videos, Merchandise, and Image Infringement of the TV Show ‘Taarak Mehta Ka Ooltah Chashmah’ Injuncted

September 12, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Copyrights, Intellectual Property 0Comment 426Views 1Like

ShareFacebook

Himalayan Organics Crumbles Before the Trademark Mountain of Himalaya

In a significant trademark dispute, the Delhi High Court issued an interim order favoring Himalaya Wellness Company, restraining Vlado Sky from using the ‘Himalayan Organics’ mark. The court recognized the potential for consumer confusion and upheld the strength of the ‘Himalaya’ trademark, allowing Vlado Sky to sell existing stock under specific conditions Continue Reading Himalayan Organics Crumbles Before the Trademark Mountain of Himalaya

September 6, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 518Views 4Likes

ShareFacebook

Thou shall not ‘STEEL’ a trademark, says court

The Madras High Court recently ruled in favor of Prakash Ferrous Industries in a trademark dispute over the ‘TIRUMALA’ mark used on TMT steel bars, granting a permanent injunction against Mansarowar Ispat. Continue Reading Thou shall not ‘STEEL’ a trademark, says court

August 30, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 379Views 2Likes

ShareFacebook

Evaluating Trademark Infringement: Holistic View and Goods Differentiation to Determine Likelihood of Confusion

The Gujarat High Court’s decision in the Unisn vs. Unison case provides critical insights into evaluating trademark infringement. The court emphasized a holistic view of trademarks, considering the distinctiveness of goods and services, thereby ruling out the likelihood of confusion. This case reinforces the importance of product differentiation in trademark disputes. Continue Reading Evaluating Trademark Infringement: Holistic View and Goods Differentiation to Determine Likelihood of Confusion

August 13, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 774Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Full and Transparent Disclosure of Material Facts for Ex-parte Injunctions

The Bombay High Court in Atyati vs. Cognizant emphasized the critical need for full and transparent disclosure in ex-parte injunctions, ruling against Atyati for suppressing material facts. This case highlights the importance of integrity in the judicial process, especially in intellectual property disputes. Continue Reading Full and Transparent Disclosure of Material Facts for Ex-parte Injunctions

August 12, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 408Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Novartis says No to Novarish

In a landmark decision, the Bombay High Court granted Novartis AG an ad-interim injunction against Novarish Healthcare Private Limited for trademark infringement. Novartis successfully argued that Novarish’s use of the “NOVARISH” mark was deceptively similar to its well-known “NOVARTIS” trademark, leading to the court’s decision to protect Novartis’s intellectual property rights. Continue Reading Novartis says No to Novarish

August 7, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 419Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Heifer’s Bullish Trademark Strategy Prevails: Court Grants Permanent Injunction

The Delhi High Court granted a permanent injunction in favor of Heifer Project International against Heifer Project India Trust and Mr. Pran K Bhatt for trademark infringement. The ruling prevents the defendants from using the “Heifer” trademarks and mandates the destruction of all materials bearing the infringing marks. Nominal damages and costs were also awarded to the plaintiff. Continue Reading Heifer’s Bullish Trademark Strategy Prevails: Court Grants Permanent Injunction

July 16, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 314Views 1Like

ShareFacebook

Celebrating 20 Years of IP Excellence

Century Ply’s claims of Trademark infringement do not fly, rules court

Delhi High Court issues injunctions for fraudulently using IP Law Firm’s Trademark and Partner’s Name

Videos, Merchandise, and Image Infringement of the TV Show ‘Taarak Mehta Ka Ooltah Chashmah’ Injuncted

Himalayan Organics Crumbles Before the Trademark Mountain of Himalaya

Thou shall not ‘STEEL’ a trademark, says court

Evaluating Trademark Infringement: Holistic View and Goods Differentiation to Determine Likelihood of Confusion

Full and Transparent Disclosure of Material Facts for Ex-parte Injunctions

Novartis says No to Novarish

Heifer’s Bullish Trademark Strategy Prevails: Court Grants Permanent Injunction

Connect with Us

BananaIP has been acknowledged as a women-owned enterprise, certified by WEConnect International.

Connect with us