Trademark Infringement Archives

“DREAM FREEDOM” Trademark removed from register for Deceptive Similarity

The Delhi High Court ruled in favor of Gemini Edibles and Fats India Ltd. in a trademark rectification petition, directing the removal of the “DREAM FREEDOM” mark from the Register of Trade Marks. The court found that the respondent had deceptively adopted the mark and trade dress of Gemini’s “FREEDOM” brand, leading to potential consumer confusion. The ruling reinforced the principles of prior use and deceptive similarity in trademark law. Continue Reading “DREAM FREEDOM” Trademark removed from register for Deceptive…

February 20, 2025 IP AI Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 522Views 1Like

ShareFacebook

A battle for respect : Svamaan Financial Takes on Sammaan Capital in Trademark case

In a significant trademark dispute, the Delhi High Court ruled in favor of Svamaan Financial Services, granting an interim injunction against Sammaan Capital Limited and its affiliates. The Court found that the defendants’ marks were deceptively similar to Svamaan, potentially misleading consumers. The ruling reinforces the importance of brand identity and legal recourse in financial services. Continue Reading A battle for respect : Svamaan Financial Takes on Sammaan Capital in Trademark case

February 18, 2025 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 431Views 2Likes

ShareFacebook

Can you reuse a discarded bottle to refill and sell your own goods or products?

The Madhya Pradesh High Court ruled in favor of Mount Everest Breweries Ltd., prohibiting the reuse of embossed beer bottles. The decision upheld the Excise Commissioner’s order, stating that reusing marked bottles leads to consumer deception and violates intellectual property rights. The appeal overturned the previous order, reinforcing legal protections for trademarks in the beer industry. Continue Reading Can you reuse a discarded bottle to refill and sell your own goods or products?

February 13, 2025 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 297Views 1Like

ShareFacebook

Shoes, footwears and deceptive similarity in Trademark law

The Delhi High Court granted a permanent injunction in favor of New Balance Athletics, Inc., restraining Kiran Shoe Company from infringing its trademarks. The Court awarded ₹7,00,000 in damages and costs, emphasizing that the defendant’s actions were deliberate and aimed at leveraging New Balance’s reputation. Continue Reading Shoes, footwears and deceptive similarity in Trademark law

January 15, 2025 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 356Views 1Like

ShareFacebook

Court reiterates importance of protecting consumers from confusion in case of pharma products

The Delhi High Court deliberated a trademark infringement case between Modi MundiPharma and Win Health Pharma. Allegations of deceptively similar trademarks in pharmaceutical products were raised, with the Court emphasizing the risk of consumer confusion. The application to challenge the validity of the defendant’s marks was disposed of, framing key issues on the marks’ invalidity. Continue Reading Court reiterates importance of protecting consumers from confusion in case of pharma products

January 13, 2025 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 344Views 1Like

ShareFacebook

A jolly win for ‘JOLLY RANCHER’ against ‘JOKY RAMPER’

The Delhi High Court issued a permanent injunction and awarded damages to Iconic IP Interests LLC and The Hershey Company in a trademark infringement and passing off case against Sarju Confectionery LLP. The defendant was found guilty of exploiting the goodwill associated with the “JOLLY RANCHER” mark by using a deceptively similar mark, “JOKY RAMPER,” and packaging. Continue Reading A jolly win for ‘JOLLY RANCHER’ against ‘JOKY RAMPER’

December 18, 2024 IP AI Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 383Views 1Like

ShareFacebook

Not everyone’s cup of coffee! Cothas Coffee sips a trademark victory

The Bengaluru Court ruled in favor of Cothas Coffee in a trademark infringement and passing-off suit, granting a permanent injunction against Defendants for using “COTHA.” The case highlights the importance of trademark rights and adherence to legal agreements in competitive business practices. Continue Reading Not everyone’s cup of coffee! Cothas Coffee sips a trademark victory

December 16, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 405Views 2Likes

ShareFacebook

Trademark Win: Swatch Group’s careful watch leads to Permanent Injunction

The Patiala House Courts in New Delhi delivered a decisive ruling in favor of Swatch Group, issuing a permanent injunction against four traders for trademark infringement and passing off. The court ordered the destruction of counterfeit goods and awarded costs to the plaintiffs, affirming their statutory rights under the Trade Marks Act, 1999. Continue Reading Trademark Win: Swatch Group’s careful watch leads to Permanent Injunction

December 6, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 508Views 2Likes

ShareFacebook

ITC obtains injunction against former owners of NIMYLE and JOR-POWR Trademarks

The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction to ITC Limited, restraining Arpita Agro from using the deceptively similar trademark “POWRNYM.” The case highlights issues of trademark infringement, passing off, and contractual obligations, emphasizing the importance of protecting intellectual property rights. Continue Reading ITC obtains injunction against former owners of NIMYLE and JOR-POWR Trademarks

December 4, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 536Views 1Like

ShareFacebook

COCOMELON spells a ‘Melon’cholic end for Copycat Competitors

The Delhi High Court ordered the cancellation of a deceptively similar COCOMELON trademark registered by the respondent. Treasure Studio Inc., the creators of the globally recognized children’s brand, successfully secured relief, ensuring stronger protection for its distinctive trademark and intellectual property rights. Continue Reading COCOMELON spells a ‘Melon’cholic end for Copycat Competitors

December 2, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 583Views 1Like

ShareFacebook

Celebrating 20 Years of IP Excellence

“DREAM FREEDOM” Trademark removed from register for Deceptive Similarity

A battle for respect : Svamaan Financial Takes on Sammaan Capital in Trademark case

Can you reuse a discarded bottle to refill and sell your own goods or products?

Shoes, footwears and deceptive similarity in Trademark law

Court reiterates importance of protecting consumers from confusion in case of pharma products

A jolly win for ‘JOLLY RANCHER’ against ‘JOKY RAMPER’

Not everyone’s cup of coffee! Cothas Coffee sips a trademark victory

Trademark Win: Swatch Group’s careful watch leads to Permanent Injunction

ITC obtains injunction against former owners of NIMYLE and JOR-POWR Trademarks

COCOMELON spells a ‘Melon’cholic end for Copycat Competitors

Connect with Us

BananaIP has been acknowledged as a women-owned enterprise, certified by WEConnect International.

Connect with us