BananaIP Counsels Logo

Celebrating 20 Years of IP Excellence

Shoes, footwears and deceptive similarity in Trademark law

Shoes, footwears and deceptive similarity in Trademark law

The Delhi High Court granted a permanent injunction in favor of New Balance Athletics, Inc., restraining Kiran Shoe Company from infringing its trademarks. The Court awarded ₹7,00,000 in damages and costs, emphasizing that the defendant’s actions were deliberate and aimed at leveraging New Balance’s reputation. Continue Reading Shoes, footwears and deceptive similarity in Trademark law
January 15, 2025 Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 177Views 0Like
Share

Read more

Court reiterates importance of protecting consumers from confusion in case of pharma products

Court reiterates importance of protecting consumers from confusion in case of pharma products

The Delhi High Court deliberated a trademark infringement case between Modi MundiPharma and Win Health Pharma. Allegations of deceptively similar trademarks in pharmaceutical products were raised, with the Court emphasizing the risk of consumer confusion. The application to challenge the validity of the defendant’s marks was disposed of, framing key issues on the marks’ invalidity. Continue Reading Court reiterates importance of protecting consumers from confusion in case of pharma products
January 13, 2025 Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 190Views 1Like
Share

Read more

A jolly win for 'JOLLY RANCHER' against 'JOKY RAMPER'

A jolly win for ‘JOLLY RANCHER’ against ‘JOKY RAMPER’

The Delhi High Court issued a permanent injunction and awarded damages to Iconic IP Interests LLC and The Hershey Company in a trademark infringement and passing off case against Sarju Confectionery LLP. The defendant was found guilty of exploiting the goodwill associated with the “JOLLY RANCHER” mark by using a deceptively similar mark, “JOKY RAMPER,” and packaging. Continue Reading A jolly win for ‘JOLLY RANCHER’ against ‘JOKY RAMPER’
December 18, 2024 Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 291Views 1Like
Share

Read more

Not everyone's cup of coffee! Cothas Coffee sips a trademark victory

Not everyone’s cup of coffee! Cothas Coffee sips a trademark victory

The Bengaluru Court ruled in favor of Cothas Coffee in a trademark infringement and passing-off suit, granting a permanent injunction against Defendants for using “COTHA.” The case highlights the importance of trademark rights and adherence to legal agreements in competitive business practices. Continue Reading Not everyone’s cup of coffee! Cothas Coffee sips a trademark victory
December 16, 2024 Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 310Views 2Likes
Share

Read more

Trademark Win: Swatch Group’s careful watch leads to Permanent Injunction

Trademark Win: Swatch Group’s careful watch leads to Permanent Injunction

The Patiala House Courts in New Delhi delivered a decisive ruling in favor of Swatch Group, issuing a permanent injunction against four traders for trademark infringement and passing off. The court ordered the destruction of counterfeit goods and awarded costs to the plaintiffs, affirming their statutory rights under the Trade Marks Act, 1999. Continue Reading Trademark Win: Swatch Group’s careful watch leads to Permanent Injunction
December 6, 2024 Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 373Views 2Likes
Share

Read more

ITC obtains injunction against former owners of NIMYLE and JOR-POWR Trademarks

ITC obtains injunction against former owners of NIMYLE and JOR-POWR Trademarks

The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction to ITC Limited, restraining Arpita Agro from using the deceptively similar trademark “POWRNYM.” The case highlights issues of trademark infringement, passing off, and contractual obligations, emphasizing the importance of protecting intellectual property rights. Continue Reading ITC obtains injunction against former owners of NIMYLE and JOR-POWR Trademarks
December 4, 2024 Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 381Views 1Like
Share

Read more

COCOMELON spells a 'Melon'cholic end for Copycat Competitors

COCOMELON spells a ‘Melon’cholic end for Copycat Competitors

The Delhi High Court ordered the cancellation of a deceptively similar COCOMELON trademark registered by the respondent. Treasure Studio Inc., the creators of the globally recognized children’s brand, successfully secured relief, ensuring stronger protection for its distinctive trademark and intellectual property rights. Continue Reading COCOMELON spells a ‘Melon’cholic end for Copycat Competitors
December 2, 2024 Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 439Views 1Like
Share

Read more

Brokering peace? "Nobroker" says NO to "NotBroker"

Brokering peace? “Nobroker” says NO to “NotBroker”

In a decisive judgment, NoBroker Technologies secured a permanent injunction against NotBroker Property Management for infringing its trademarks ‘%NOBROKER’ and ‘NoBrokerHood.’ The Court found NotBroker’s use of the mark ‘NOT BROKER’ and the domain ‘notbroker.com’ deceptively similar, granting relief to NoBroker, including removal of the infringing domain. Continue Reading Brokering peace? “Nobroker” says NO to “NotBroker”
November 26, 2024 Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 445Views 2Likes
Share

Read more

Real blow to infringers by L’Oreal, court issues injunction for Trademark infringement

Real blow to infringers by L’Oreal, court issues injunction for Trademark infringement

The Delhi Commercial Court granted L’Oreal a permanent injunction against M/s Oneness Enterprises for importing counterfeit goods bearing L’Oreal’s trademarks. The Court also restrained Customs Offices from releasing the seized goods and directed their destruction under applicable rules, ensuring strong protection of L’Oreal’s intellectual property rights. Continue Reading Real blow to infringers by L’Oreal, court issues injunction for Trademark infringement
November 21, 2024 Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 479Views 2Likes
Share

Read more

"TATA COPPER+ WATER” Trademark Infringement Injuncted with Nominal Damages

“TATA COPPER+ WATER” Trademark Infringement Injuncted with Nominal Damages

The Delhi High Court issued a permanent injunction in favor of Tata Sons, preventing the use of trademarks and trade dress similar to “TATA COPPER+ WATER.” The defendant ceased infringement and nominal damages of ₹1,00,000 were awarded, acknowledging the defendant’s cooperation and first-time offense. Continue Reading “TATA COPPER+ WATER” Trademark Infringement Injuncted with Nominal Damages
November 15, 2024 Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 348Views 2Likes
Share

Read more