BananaIP Counsels Logo

Celebrating 20 Years of IP Excellence

Not everyone's cup of coffee! Cothas Coffee sips a trademark victory

Not everyone’s cup of coffee! Cothas Coffee sips a trademark victory

The Bengaluru Court ruled in favor of Cothas Coffee in a trademark infringement and passing-off suit, granting a permanent injunction against Defendants for using “COTHA.” The case highlights the importance of trademark rights and adherence to legal agreements in competitive business practices. Continue Reading Not everyone’s cup of coffee! Cothas Coffee sips a trademark victory
1 day ago Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 58Views 0Like
Share

Read more

The sticky trademark fight between "FIGHTER" and "FITTER"

The sticky trademark fight between “FIGHTER” and “FITTER”

The Calcutta High Court has granted interim relief to Kamal Kumar Hirawat, restraining Maruti Poly Films from using the trademark “FITTER.” The Court held that the mark was deceptively similar to the petitioner’s registered trademark “FIGHTER,” used for adhesive tapes since 1995, and could cause consumer confusion, potentially harming the petitioner’s business. Continue Reading The sticky trademark fight between “FIGHTER” and “FITTER”
5 days ago Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 148Views 0Like
Share

Read more

Monster Energy falls short of "Energy for the 'Trademark' Journey"

Monster Energy falls short of “Energy for the ‘Trademark’ Journey”

The Madras High Court dismissed Monster Energy’s appeal against the refusal to register “Energy for the Journey” as a trademark, citing lack of distinctiveness. The Court upheld that generic or descriptive marks cannot be monopolized without evidence of secondary significance, allowing the appellant to reapply upon establishing distinctiveness through prolonged use. Continue Reading Monster Energy falls short of “Energy for the ‘Trademark’ Journey”
December 11, 2024 Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 164Views 0Like
Share

Read more

Delhi High Court Protects Hindware’s Trademark and Design Rights

Delhi High Court Protects Hindware’s Trademark and Design Rights

The Delhi High Court granted interim injunctions in favor of Hindware Limited, restraining the Defendants from infringing Hindware’s trademarks and registered design. This landmark ruling underscores the importance of protecting trademark and design rights against counterfeit products. Continue Reading Delhi High Court Protects Hindware’s Trademark and Design Rights
December 10, 2024 Case Reviews, Industrial Designs, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 169Views 0Like
Share

Read more

Trademark Win: Swatch Group’s careful watch leads to Permanent Injunction

Trademark Win: Swatch Group’s careful watch leads to Permanent Injunction

The Patiala House Courts in New Delhi delivered a decisive ruling in favor of Swatch Group, issuing a permanent injunction against four traders for trademark infringement and passing off. The court ordered the destruction of counterfeit goods and awarded costs to the plaintiffs, affirming their statutory rights under the Trade Marks Act, 1999. Continue Reading Trademark Win: Swatch Group’s careful watch leads to Permanent Injunction
December 6, 2024 Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 194Views 1Like
Share

Read more

ITC obtains injunction against former owners of NIMYLE and JOR-POWR Trademarks

ITC obtains injunction against former owners of NIMYLE and JOR-POWR Trademarks

The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction to ITC Limited, restraining Arpita Agro from using the deceptively similar trademark “POWRNYM.” The case highlights issues of trademark infringement, passing off, and contractual obligations, emphasizing the importance of protecting intellectual property rights. Continue Reading ITC obtains injunction against former owners of NIMYLE and JOR-POWR Trademarks
December 4, 2024 Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 219Views 0Like
Share

Read more

COCOMELON spells a 'Melon'cholic end for Copycat Competitors

COCOMELON spells a ‘Melon’cholic end for Copycat Competitors

The Delhi High Court ordered the cancellation of a deceptively similar COCOMELON trademark registered by the respondent. Treasure Studio Inc., the creators of the globally recognized children’s brand, successfully secured relief, ensuring stronger protection for its distinctive trademark and intellectual property rights. Continue Reading COCOMELON spells a ‘Melon’cholic end for Copycat Competitors
December 2, 2024 Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 276Views 1Like
Share

Read more

Polo rides to the finish line in trademark infringement dispute

Polo rides to the finish line in trademark infringement dispute

The Delhi District Court granted a permanent injunction to Polo Lauren Company L.P. against Landmark Traders and Mystic Emin Private Ltd., holding that the defendants infringed Polo’s trademarks. The case highlighted the test for trademark infringement and emphasized the presumption of confusion in identical marks and the need to prove confusion for deceptively similar marks. Continue Reading Polo rides to the finish line in trademark infringement dispute
November 28, 2024 Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 287Views 3Likes
Share

Read more

Classic Fireworks' Trademark goes up in smoke, Eagle wins over Garuda

Classic Fireworks’ Trademark goes up in smoke, Eagle wins over Garuda

The Madras High Court resolved a trademark dispute between M/s. The Southern India Exporting Company and M/s. The Classic Fireworks Industries, ruling that the ‘Eagle’ mark held prior rights over ‘Garuda.’ The Court found that the marks’ similarities could confuse consumers and rejected claims of acquiescence. Continue Reading Classic Fireworks’ Trademark goes up in smoke, Eagle wins over Garuda
November 27, 2024 Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 198Views 1Like
Share

Read more