This post dissects the Sufficiency of Disclosure aspect in the Ericsson Vs. Lava case, scrutinizing the court’s assessment of Ericsson’s patents’ validity under Sections 64(1)(h) and 64(1)(i) of the Patents Act. Drawing from legal precedents and patent law, the analysis highlights how the court deemed Ericsson’s patents to meet the requirements, ultimately dismissing Lava’s grounds for revocation.
Read more about Sufficiency of Disclosure – Ericsson vs Lava – Part XTag: Sufficiency of Disclosure
Refusal of patent application relating to ‘Soluble Foaming Composition’ set aside
Featured image for Refusal of patent application relating to ‘Soluble Foaming Composition’ set aside
Protein-free foaming innovation revived! Madras High Court overturns patent refusal due to Controller’s failure to address key arguments and consider crucial differences from prior art. This judgment highlights the importance of thorough analysis and considering applicant submissions in patent decisions.
Read more about Refusal of patent application relating to ‘Soluble Foaming Composition’ set asideReview and Reversal of Patent Refusal Orders by the Madras High Court
Madras High Court supports three inventions by overturning three patent refusals on grounds of Lack of valid grounds (RTA-408 case), failure to consider inventive features (fluidized bed boiler case) and procedural error (fuel temperature control case).
Read more about Review and Reversal of Patent Refusal Orders by the Madras High Court