Tag: patent Office

Patentability vs. Procedure: Finding the Right Balance during patent examinations

Patentability vs. Procedure: Finding the Right Balance during patent examinations Featured image for Patentability vs. Procedure: Finding the Right Balance during patent examinations

The Delhi High Court ruled in favor of Arcturus Therapeutics, overturning the Controller’s rejection of its patent application on procedural grounds. The Court emphasized that procedural compliance should not override substantive examination, directing the Patent Office to reassess the application on its merits.

Read more about Patentability vs. Procedure: Finding the Right Balance during patent examinations

A doped order on method of doping, court clarifies

A doped order on method of doping, court clarifies Featured image for A doped order on method of doping, court clarifies

The Madras High Court confirmed the Patent Office’s rejection of IIT Madras’s patent for a method of doping potassium into ammonium perchlorate. The Court agreed with the rejection based on Sections 3(d) and 2(1)(ja) of the Patents Act, but noted procedural shortcomings in the handling of the case.

Read more about A doped order on method of doping, court clarifies

Court balances Hygieia’s patent application after IPO disbalances it under section 59

Court balances Hygieia’s patent application after IPO disbalances it under section 59 Featured image for Court balances Hygieia’s patent application after IPO disbalances it under section 59

The Madras High Court has set aside the refusal of Hygieia Inc.’s patent application, highlighting the need for proper consideration of amended claims. The court emphasized the importance of interpreting claims in conjunction with their specifications and has directed a re-examination of the application by a different controller within six months.

Read more about Court balances Hygieia’s patent application after IPO disbalances it under section 59

Patent refusal order set aside, matter remanded back for DeNovo consideration

Patent refusal order set aside, matter remanded back for DeNovo consideration Featured image for Patent refusal order set aside, matter remanded back for DeNovo consideration

The Delhi High Court has faulted the Patent Office for rejecting a patent application without adequate reasoning. The case involved a beverage can closure design, and the Controller’s decision lacked clarity and failed to address the applicant’s arguments effectively. The Court has sent the case back for a proper re-examination, highlighting the need for thoroughness in patent application reviews.

Read more about Patent refusal order set aside, matter remanded back for DeNovo consideration

Patent refusals: The need for clarity and details beyond mere objections.

Patent refusals: The need for clarity and details beyond mere objections. Featured image for Patent refusals: The need for clarity and details beyond mere objections.

The Delhi High Court recently highlighted the importance of clear and detailed reasoning in patent office rejections. In this case of Calm Water Therapeutics LLC’s patent application, the court found the initial rejection order by the patent office to be flawed as the revised claim was not considered and no detailed explanation was provided in the rejection. The court emphasized the need for the Patent Office to provide clear explanations and conduct thorough examinations before rejecting applications.

Read more about Patent refusals: The need for clarity and details beyond mere objections.

Objections regarding insufficiency of disclosure in patent applications must be clear and unambiguous

Objections regarding insufficiency of disclosure in patent applications must be clear and unambiguous Featured image for Objections regarding insufficiency of disclosure in patent applications must be clear and unambiguous

The Delhi High Court recently ruled that the Indian Patent Office (IPO) must clearly and unambiguously articulate objections to patent applications. This case involved Microsoft’s patent application for “Discovery of Secure Network Enclaves,” which was rejected by the IPO for lacking inventive step and violating disclosure requirements. The Court found the IPO’s objections to be ambiguous and procedurally irregular, thereby stressing on fair hearings and proper communication during the patent examination process.

Read more about Objections regarding insufficiency of disclosure in patent applications must be clear and unambiguous

Manual of Patent Office Practice and Procedure: BananaIP’s Comments / Suggestions

Manual of Patent Office Practice and Procedure: BananaIP’s Comments / Suggestions Featured image for Manual of Patent Office Practice and Procedure: BananaIP’s Comments / Suggestions

BananaIP Counsels has recently submitted its comments and suggestions to the Office of Controller General of Patents, Designs & Trade Marks (CGPDTM) with respect to...

Read more about Manual of Patent Office Practice and Procedure: BananaIP’s Comments / Suggestions

Without Proper Inventive Step Analysis, Patent Office’s Order is Unreasoned – Says Delhi High Court

Without Proper Inventive Step Analysis, Patent Office’s Order is Unreasoned – Says Delhi High Court Featured image for Without Proper Inventive Step Analysis, Patent Office’s Order is Unreasoned – Says Delhi High Court

In a recent case involving Gogoro Inc, the Delhi High Court remanded a patent decision back to the patent office on the ground that the...

Read more about Without Proper Inventive Step Analysis, Patent Office’s Order is Unreasoned – Says Delhi High Court