Tag: Patent Claims

New claims, Old claims, and Claim Amendments: Section 59 of the Patents Act

New claims, Old claims, and Claim Amendments: Section 59 of the Patents Act Featured image for New claims, Old claims, and Claim Amendments: Section 59 of the Patents Act

In a significant ruling, the Madras High Court clarified that amending claims in a patent application does not imply abandonment of earlier claims. The court directed that decisions should be based on the amended claims. This analysis was part of Genomatica Inc. vs Controller of Patents case.

Read more about New claims, Old claims, and Claim Amendments: Section 59 of the Patents Act

Sufficiency of Disclosure – Ericsson vs Lava – Part X

Sufficiency of Disclosure – Ericsson vs Lava – Part X Featured image for Sufficiency of Disclosure – Ericsson vs Lava – Part X

This post dissects the Sufficiency of Disclosure aspect in the Ericsson Vs. Lava case, scrutinizing the court’s assessment of Ericsson’s patents’ validity under Sections 64(1)(h) and 64(1)(i) of the Patents Act. Drawing from legal precedents and patent law, the analysis highlights how the court deemed Ericsson’s patents to meet the requirements, ultimately dismissing Lava’s grounds for revocation.

Read more about Sufficiency of Disclosure – Ericsson vs Lava – Part X

Product by Process Patent Claims are Product Claims, not Process Claims, rules the Delhi High Court

Product by Process Patent Claims are Product Claims, not Process Claims, rules the Delhi High Court Featured image for Product by Process Patent Claims are Product Claims, not Process Claims, rules the Delhi High Court

In a landmark decision, the Delhi High Court clarifies the nature of product by process patent claims in the ferric carboxymaltose dispute between Vifor International and MSN Labs.

Read more about Product by Process Patent Claims are Product Claims, not Process Claims, rules the Delhi High Court