Several aspects of Fair, Reasonable, and Non-Discriminatory (FRAND) Licensing were discussed in the Ericsson Vs. Lava Case, and in this post, we will discuss three of those: Royalty Stacking, Hold Up, and Hold Out.
Read more about Exploring Patent Hold Up, Royalty Stacking, and Hold Out – Ericsson v. Lava – Part 3Tag: Ericsson SEP case
Section 3(k) principles – Ericsson vs. Lava – Part 2
While Part 1 of the Ericsson vs. Lava post series covered the summary of the court's judgement, this post discusses the principles reiterated by the...
Read more about Section 3(k) principles – Ericsson vs. Lava – Part 2Standard Essential Patents (SEPs) and Royalty Rates (Ericsson vs. Lava) – Part 1
In a comprehensive and extensive judgment, the Delhi High Court has recently adjudicated in favor of Ericsson in a patent infringement lawsuit concerning Standard Essential Patents (SEPs). The dispute was initiated by Ericsson against Lava over eight patents integral to the standards for 2G, Edge, and 3G technology implementations.
Read more about Standard Essential Patents (SEPs) and Royalty Rates (Ericsson vs. Lava) – Part 1