Intellepedia - IP News Center | Page 12 of 277

Court says infringing brand ‘Double Kabooter’ Jaa Jaa Jaa

The Delhi High Court ruled in favor of Anuj Bindal, the prior user of ‘Dabal Kabooter Brand,’ in a trademark dispute against ‘Double Kabooter Brand.’ This case highlights the importance of prior use and the implications of false statements in trademark applications. Continue Reading Court says infringing brand ‘Double Kabooter’ Jaa Jaa Jaa

BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks May 23, 2024 383Views 0Like

Snack Wars: Haldiram’s Battle for Brand Supremacy

Delhi High Court upholds Haldiram’s trademark rights, awarding Rs. 50 lakhs in damages and recognizing ‘HALDIRAM’ as a well-known mark in a legal battle against unauthorized use. Continue Reading Snack Wars: Haldiram’s Battle for Brand Supremacy

BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks May 22, 2024 489Views 0Like

Lost in the Inbox? Delhi High Court Saves Dabur’s Trademark Application

Delhi High Court revives Dabur’s ODONIL MYSTIC ROSE trademark application, citing procedural lapses by the Trade Marks Registry in serving the notice of opposition. Continue Reading Lost in the Inbox? Delhi High Court Saves Dabur’s Trademark Application

BananaIP Reporter Intellectual Property, Trademarks May 21, 2024 417Views 0Like

Cancerous Battle: Novartis and NATCO clash over Eltrombopag

In a landmark decision, the Delhi High Court overturned an injunction against Natco, allowing them to produce a generic version of Novartis’s cancer drug. The Court held that Novartis’s patent on a specific salt form of the drug (ELT-O) lacked novelty due to its coverage in an earlier patent (IN’176). Continue Reading Cancerous Battle: Novartis and NATCO clash over Eltrombopag

BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Patents May 20, 2024 879Views 2Likes

The Court refuses to remove names of Trademark Officers from the order

In this review petition filed before the Delhi High Court, the Court rejected the plea filed by the Trademark Officer to remove their names from the order. Continue Reading The Court refuses to remove names of Trademark Officers from the order

BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks May 17, 2024 483Views 0Like

Sufficiency of Disclosure – Ericsson vs Lava – Part X

This post dissects the Sufficiency of Disclosure aspect in the Ericsson Vs. Lava case, scrutinizing the court’s assessment of Ericsson’s patents’ validity under Sections 64(1)(h) and 64(1)(i) of the Patents Act. Drawing from legal precedents and patent law, the analysis highlights how the court deemed Ericsson’s patents to meet the requirements, ultimately dismissing Lava’s grounds for revocation. Continue Reading Sufficiency of Disclosure – Ericsson vs Lava – Part X

BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Patents May 16, 2024 492Views 0Like

Lights out for “Everyday” Lighters : Injunction in favour of EVEREADY

The Delhi High Court has restrained KSC Industries from using the mark “Everyday” for lighters, finding it deceptively similar to Eveready’s well-known trademark for batteries and lighting products. Continue Reading Lights out for “Everyday” Lighters : Injunction in favour of EVEREADY

BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks May 15, 2024 451Views 0Like

Transparency Triumphs : Patent Refusals must elucidate clear grounds

The Delhi High Court recently ruled in favor of Calm Water Therapeutics LLC, highlighting the importance of transparent reasoning in patent refusal decisions. The Court’s observations underscored flaws in the Controller’s assessment, emphasizing the necessity of comprehensive reasoning behind such refusals. Continue Reading Transparency Triumphs : Patent Refusals must elucidate clear grounds

BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Patents May 14, 2024 401Views 1Like

Indian Patent and Design Statistics 2024 (May 3rd to 10th)

19th issue of the Indian Patent Journal (10th May 2024) features 1,745 patent publications, 591 grants, and 1,017 registered designs. Continue Reading Indian Patent and Design Statistics 2024 (May 3rd to 10th)

BananaIP Reporter Intellectual Property, Patent & Design Statistics, Patents May 14, 2024 368Views 0Like

Novelty and Inventive Step analysis (Part B) – Ericsson Vs. Lava – Part IX

This post covers the intricate legal analysis of Ericsson’s patents essential for 3G and EDGE standards, dissecting novelty and inventive step aspects. Delve into the court’s scrutiny of prior art arguments and its decision on each patent’s validity. Continue Reading Novelty and Inventive Step analysis (Part B) – Ericsson Vs. Lava – Part IX

BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Patents May 13, 2024 580Views 0Like

Celebrating 20 Years of IP Excellence

Court says infringing brand ‘Double Kabooter’ Jaa Jaa Jaa

Snack Wars: Haldiram’s Battle for Brand Supremacy

Lost in the Inbox? Delhi High Court Saves Dabur’s Trademark Application

Cancerous Battle: Novartis and NATCO clash over Eltrombopag

The Court refuses to remove names of Trademark Officers from the order

Sufficiency of Disclosure – Ericsson vs Lava – Part X

Lights out for “Everyday” Lighters : Injunction in favour of EVEREADY

Transparency Triumphs : Patent Refusals must elucidate clear grounds

Indian Patent and Design Statistics 2024 (May 3rd to 10th)

Novelty and Inventive Step analysis (Part B) – Ericsson Vs. Lava – Part IX

Connect with Us

BananaIP has been acknowledged as a women-owned enterprise, certified by WEConnect International.

Connect with us