Intellepedia - IP News Center | Page 11 of 277

Madras High Court criticizes inconsistent patent examination in Industeel France case, emphasizing fair and thorough evaluation for inventors.

Patent examination should not kill the scientific temper of an inventor

The Madras High Court criticized inconsistent patent examination practices in Industeel France’s case, emphasizing the need for a fair and thorough evaluation process. The court ordered a de novo examination by a different Controller and stressed the importance of maintaining scientific temper. Continue Reading Patent examination should not kill the scientific temper of an inventor

BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Patents June 6, 2024 453Views 0Like

Madras High Court clarifies that claim amendments in a patent application do not mean abandoning earlier claims. Learn about the court's decision in Genomatica Inc. vs Controller of Patents

New claims, Old claims, and Claim Amendments: Section 59 of the Patents Act

In a significant ruling, the Madras High Court clarified that amending claims in a patent application does not imply abandonment of earlier claims. The court directed that decisions should be based on the amended claims. This analysis was part of Genomatica Inc. vs Controller of Patents case. Continue Reading New claims, Old claims, and Claim Amendments: Section 59 of the Patents Act

BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Patents June 5, 2024 445Views 0Like

Image accompanying blogpost on "Renounced Riches, Not Rights! Court uploads Sanyasi's copyrights"

Renounced Riches, Not Rights! Court upholds Sanyasi’s copyrights

The Delhi High Court ruled in favor of Bhaktivedanta Book Trust, upholding Srila Prabhupada’s copyrights despite his status as a Sanyasi. The court decreed that Srila Prabhupada’s intellectual property rights were valid and had been rightfully assigned to the Trust. Continue Reading Renounced Riches, Not Rights! Court upholds Sanyasi’s copyrights

BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Copyrights, Intellectual Property June 3, 2024 542Views 2Likes

Image featuring INDIAN PATENT AND DESIGN STATISTICS 2024 (MAY 17TH TO MAY 24TH)

Indian Patent and Design Statistics 2024 (May 17th to 24th)

21st issue of the Indian Patent Journal (24th May 2024) features 829 patent publications, 760 grants, and 527 registered designs. Continue Reading Indian Patent and Design Statistics 2024 (May 17th to 24th)

BananaIP Reporter Intellectual Property, Patent & Design Statistics, Patents May 31, 2024 390Views 0Like

Monoclonal antibodies and Patents – How the Madras High Court interpreted Section 3(c)

The Madras High Court clarified the interpretation of Section 3(c) in the context of monoclonal antibodies patent in Genmab A/S v. Assistant Controller of Patents. The court emphasized the importance of novelty and technical advancement for patent eligibility. Continue Reading Monoclonal antibodies and Patents – How the Madras High Court interpreted Section 3(c)

BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Patents May 31, 2024 577Views 0Like

Authors, Copyright and Royalty Share : The Calcutta High Court gives clarity

The Calcutta High Court’s landmark decision in Vodafone v. Saregama clarifies the royalty rights of authors of literary and musical works. The ruling states that authors are entitled to royalties regardless of when their works were created or the nature of copyright ownership transfers. Continue Reading Authors, Copyright and Royalty Share : The Calcutta High Court gives clarity

BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Copyrights, Intellectual Property May 30, 2024 819Views 0Like

All set for VOMISET : Court restores trademark and allows renewal beyond deadline

Indi Pharma Pvt Ltd successfully petitioned the High Court of Bombay to restore its trademark application for VOMISET and allow its renewal. The Court’s decision was based on the precedent set in the Motwane case, highlighting the importance of proper notification for trademark renewals. Continue Reading All set for VOMISET : Court restores trademark and allows renewal beyond deadline

BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks May 29, 2024 420Views 2Likes

Court criticizes Patent Office for using outdated CRI Guidelines

The Madras High Court criticized the Patent Office for using outdated CRI guidelines of 2016 instead of the revised 2017 guidelines in evaluating Microsoft’s patent application. The court emphasized the importance of assessing technical effect or contribution in CRIs without considering hardware. Continue Reading Court criticizes Patent Office for using outdated CRI Guidelines

BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Patents May 28, 2024 474Views 0Like

Note on the WIPO Treaty on Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources, and Associated Traditional Knowledge

The WIPO Treaty on Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources, and Traditional Knowledge aims to enhance patent system efficiency and transparency regarding genetic resources and traditional knowledge. Continue Reading Note on the WIPO Treaty on Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources, and Associated Traditional Knowledge

BananaIP Reporter Intellectual Property, Patents, Traditional Knowledge May 27, 2024 450Views 0Like

Victory for Novozymes: Madras High Court Overrules Patent Office’s Refusal

The Madras High Court, in a decision dated March 19, 2024, set aside a patent refusal order issued by the Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs in the case of a patent application filed by Novozymes A/S. This post summarizes the decision of the court in this case. Continue Reading Victory for Novozymes: Madras High Court Overrules Patent Office’s Refusal

BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Patents May 27, 2024 483Views 0Like

Celebrating 20 Years of IP Excellence

Patent examination should not kill the scientific temper of an inventor

New claims, Old claims, and Claim Amendments: Section 59 of the Patents Act

Renounced Riches, Not Rights! Court upholds Sanyasi’s copyrights

Indian Patent and Design Statistics 2024 (May 17th to 24th)

Monoclonal antibodies and Patents – How the Madras High Court interpreted Section 3(c)

Authors, Copyright and Royalty Share : The Calcutta High Court gives clarity

All set for VOMISET : Court restores trademark and allows renewal beyond deadline

Court criticizes Patent Office for using outdated CRI Guidelines

Note on the WIPO Treaty on Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources, and Associated Traditional Knowledge

Victory for Novozymes: Madras High Court Overrules Patent Office’s Refusal

Connect with Us

BananaIP has been acknowledged as a women-owned enterprise, certified by WEConnect International.

Connect with us