Trademarks Archives | Page 7 of 68

DISPOWAY Trademark Disposal Set Aside: Hearing Notice Not Received

The Delhi High Court set aside the refusal order for the ‘DISPOWAY’ trademark after confirming that Disposafe Health And Life Care Limited did not receive the hearing notice. The court remanded the matter to the Registrar of Trademarks, directing the issuance of a fresh notice and restoration of the application. Continue Reading DISPOWAY Trademark Disposal Set Aside: Hearing Notice Not Received

August 27, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 349Views 2Likes

ShareFacebook

Jumbo Tramples Haathi Trademark Registration

The Calcutta High Court ruled in favor of Girnar Food & Beverages Pvt. Ltd., overturning the Registrar’s decision and quashing the registration of a deceptively similar ‘HAATHI’ mark by Bicrampore Tea Estate. This ruling underscores the significance of consumer perception and the potential for deception in trademark disputes. Continue Reading Jumbo Tramples Haathi Trademark Registration

August 16, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 356Views 1Like

ShareFacebook

Indian IP Office Orders Re-evaluation of Trademark Applications

The Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs, and Trademarks (CGPDTM) has issued a directive for the re-validation of trademark applications processed by officers hired through the Quality Council of India. The process will involve a two-tier review system to ensure accuracy and compliance with current legal provisions, with a goal of processing 250 applications per day. Continue Reading Indian IP Office Orders Re-evaluation of Trademark Applications

August 14, 2024 IP AI Reporter Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 614Views 1Like

ShareFacebook

Evaluating Trademark Infringement: Holistic View and Goods Differentiation to Determine Likelihood of Confusion

The Gujarat High Court’s decision in the Unisn vs. Unison case provides critical insights into evaluating trademark infringement. The court emphasized a holistic view of trademarks, considering the distinctiveness of goods and services, thereby ruling out the likelihood of confusion. This case reinforces the importance of product differentiation in trademark disputes. Continue Reading Evaluating Trademark Infringement: Holistic View and Goods Differentiation to Determine Likelihood of Confusion

August 13, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 1090Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Full and Transparent Disclosure of Material Facts for Ex-parte Injunctions

The Bombay High Court in Atyati vs. Cognizant emphasized the critical need for full and transparent disclosure in ex-parte injunctions, ruling against Atyati for suppressing material facts. This case highlights the importance of integrity in the judicial process, especially in intellectual property disputes. Continue Reading Full and Transparent Disclosure of Material Facts for Ex-parte Injunctions

August 12, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 478Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Novartis says No to Novarish

In a landmark decision, the Bombay High Court granted Novartis AG an ad-interim injunction against Novarish Healthcare Private Limited for trademark infringement. Novartis successfully argued that Novarish’s use of the “NOVARISH” mark was deceptively similar to its well-known “NOVARTIS” trademark, leading to the court’s decision to protect Novartis’s intellectual property rights. Continue Reading Novartis says No to Novarish

August 7, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 469Views 0Like

ShareFacebook

Did Emerge Classes’ mark fail the ‘passing off’ test?

The Srinagar Bench of the Jammu and Kashmir High Court dismissed an appeal by Emerge Classes in a trademark passing off case. The court emphasized that minor differences in trademarks do not necessarily make them distinct, upholding the injunction in favor of KIE and its associated entities. Continue Reading Did Emerge Classes’ mark fail the ‘passing off’ test?

August 5, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 446Views 1Like

ShareFacebook

Similarity Overdose : Glaxo’s trade dress vs Qpharm’s trade dress

Glaxo Group Limited secured a legal victory in a trade dress dispute against Qpharm Health Care Limited. The Delhi High Court restrained Qpharm from using deceptively similar packaging and ordered the removal of infringing listings from third-party websites, protecting Glaxo’s established trademarks. Continue Reading Similarity Overdose : Glaxo’s trade dress vs Qpharm’s trade dress

August 1, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 428Views 1Like

ShareFacebook

Tusk of War : Girnar’s Jumbo Overpowers North-Western’s Haathi

Girnar Food & Beverages Pvt. Ltd. wins a significant legal battle as the Calcutta High Court cancels The North-Western Cachar Tea Co. Ltd.’s trademark registration. The Court cited brand confusion and insufficient evidence of use by North-Western. Continue Reading Tusk of War : Girnar’s Jumbo Overpowers North-Western’s Haathi

July 25, 2024 BananaIP Reporter Case Reviews, Intellectual Property, Trademarks 0Comment 406Views 2Likes

ShareFacebook

Madras HC on Phonetic Similarity: Little Einsteins vs. Little Einsteinz

The Madras High Court ruled in favor of Sebille Educations, asserting that phonetic similarity takes precedence over visual differences in the trademark dispute between “Little Einsteins” and “Little Einsteinz,” emphasizing the importance of protecting established brands from deceptively similar marks. Continue Reading Madras HC on Phonetic Similarity: Little Einsteins vs. Little Einsteinz